GLM
5 recommend 0 criticize 3 moved to it
Why hackers recommend it
“We already switched from openAI to GLM and now this is just a better model with the same price”jackbeanstalk20, 2026-10-24original comment ↗
“Same here. Moved from Opus to GLM 5.2 to 5.3 and I've been pretty happy with the result.”Sayrus, 2026-09-21original comment ↗
“I found it tends to be a stronger debugger when it comes to fixing openclaw issues with bash, being more thorough in finding the right root cause.”chillacy, 2026-05-06original comment ↗
“They give these opensource source models.”arjun-mavonic, 2026-04-28original comment ↗
“GLM 5.1 is simply where its at right now. It is not the best model, but it is much better than Sonnet at 1/5 the cost.”jeremyjh, 2026-04-23original comment ↗
What hackers criticize
No criticism captured yet.
Use GLM? Get alerted when hackers criticize it.
Tell us the tools in your stack. When hackers start criticizing one of them, or moving to an alternative, you will hear about it first.
Hackers moved from GLM to
Nobody yet.
Hackers moved to GLM from
- Claude Opus → GLM (1 hacker)
- Kimi → GLM (1 hacker)
- OpenAI → GLM (1 hacker)
Badge
Show the number of hackers who recommend GLM in your README or site.
[](https://hackerpicks.org/tool/glm)